7 Oct 2010
In applying concepts on a large scale basis, clarifying terminology is not only helpful, but vital. Vocabulary in the sciences is no different. Clear, precise definitions allow for minimum confusion and promote effective communication. It is also important to know when two terms are synonyms as opposed to similar concepts. One such example is found within soil ecology, involving the terms “soil quality” and “soil health.”
Soil quality, simply stated, is considered to be the ability of the soil to perform its functions. While this general definition is somewhat ambiguous, Karlen et al. (1997) describes soil quality much more specifically as “the capacity of a specific kind of soil to function, within natural or managed ecosystem boundaries, to sustain plant and animal productivity, maintain or enhance water and air quality, and support human health and habitation.” According to this definition, a high quality soil is a high functioning soil. Such a soil would have good aggregation and sufficient pore space to allow air and water to penetrate and promote life above and below ground. High quality soil should also contain appropriate amounts of organic matter and a balanced mineral content to ensure the nutrients are available to the resident organisms. Also important is the soil texture- the distribution of charged particles, such as the negatively charged clay, can impact water retention and nutrient availability, impacting many other areas of the soil’s ecology.
Soil health also focuses on the ability of soil to function, but it includes the idea that soils are, in a sense, living entities. According to Doran and Zeiss (2000), “soil health is the capacity of soil to function as a vital living system, within ecosystem and land-use boundaries, to sustain plant and animal productivity, maintain or enhance water and air quality, and promote plant and animal health.” A healthy soil would include the same things as a high quality soil. But when considering a soil to be a healthy soil, emphasis would also placed on ensuring that the interconnected systems and processes that allow a soil to behave as it does remain intact, and that the soil supports biodiversity and species richness.
While the terms soil quality and soil health seem nearly identical, there is one main difference that prevents the terms from being interchangeable synonyms. If a soil is high quality, there is a good chance it will be healthy, and vice versa, but not necessarily. However, soil quality includes benefitting humans, while soil health refers more to the intactness of the soil ecosystem. Because of this, a high quality soil that is productive by human standards, either for agriculture or by providing a base for development, might not be a healthy soil due to compaction, pollution, and other factors that would limit the ability of natural cycles to function and would inhibit natural biodiversity and abundant life. While high quality soil does require organisms dwelling within it, such as bacteria, earthworms, and many others, to make it high quality, the original species biodiversity and richness probably is not the same. Good soil health, on the contrary, aims to preserve these components essential to the soil organism. Due to these differences, soil quality and soil health, while very similar terms, are not the same and should be used appropriately.
Doran, J.W., Zeiss, M.R., 2000. Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic
component of soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology 15, 3–11.
Karlen, D.L., M.J. Mausbach, J.W. Doran, R.G. Cline, R.F. Harris, and G.E. Schuman.
1997. Soil quality: A concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil
Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61:4-10.